Drowning in it

redink-budget-500.jpg

This sea could be ink, or it could be blood. At this point, it hardly matters that it's both ink and blood, because the U.S. budget's about to capsize in it.

Online Forex Trading's Rebekah Manning (referred to in an earlier item) notes that Barack Obama's first proposed budget is a "sea of 140 pages" and that its roughly $1.2 trillion size is itself roughly divided in half between the Department of Defense and everything else. She does a good job breaking it down.

But it's actually the budget that's floating in a sea of red. At least now we can get a truer picture of its staggering numbers.

Economist Joseph Stiglitz points out that at least Obama's budget actually includes the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan:

Under the Bush presidency, nearly all funding for the wars -- which now totals some $900 billion -- was appropriated outside the regular budget process through a series of "emergency supplemental" appropriations.

The rest of what 2001 Nobel laureate Stiglitz says is worth quoting, even if his post is nothing more than another ad for his book (with Linda Bilmes) The Three Trillion Dollar War:

This mechanism, which was supposed to be used for genuine unexpected emergencies like hurricanes -- had several pernicious effects.

First, it hid the true cost of the war. Every year, the President's budget presented a charade in which everyone knew that the war spending was not included in the budget but would eventually be requested.

Second, money requested through the "emergency supplementaL" was subject to a less rigorous scrutiny than ordinary money, with the result that Congressional budget analysts of both parties had little time to analyze the billions of dollars worth of contracts and other spending. This is one of the reasons for the profiteering and other consequences.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly -- the use of this funding trick meant that Congress never had to make any real choices or trade-offs between war spending and other spending. Instead, Congress played along with this charade, spending money we don't have. This led to ballooning deficits and increased the national debt by nearly a trillion dollars.