Wednesday, Apr. 15 2009 @ 8:52AM
It took a day or so for analysts and investors to catch up to the bullshit emanating from Goldman Sachs's reports of a healthy first quarter and its proud announcement that it was selling stock to raise money and was ready to pay back the government.
But other sharks on Wall Street caught a whiff of blood in the water, and Goldman's share-price bounced back down.
Questions remain, however, about why exactly Goldman raked in bailout money last fall ("Mutiny of the bountiful").
As for the analysts and other observers: The Wall Street Journal laid it out well this morning, ahead of the opening bell:
Analysts had a mixed view of Goldman's first quarter, even though the firm's profit was higher than expected.
David Trone, an analyst at Fox-Pitt Kelton said the results were "strong on the surface, quite weak below the surface." Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Brad Hintz said that while Goldman's fixed-income, currency and commodities department hit it out of the ballpark in the quarter "trends for other lines of business were generally weak relative to prior periods and continue to reflect the malaise in the broader economy."
A capital-markets executive on Wall Street said the stock declined, in part, because of worries that Goldman mightn't be able to repeat its first-quarter earnings results, and the firm pulled off the sale after a stock-price run-up on the best news it will have for 90 to 180 days.
Itching to extricate itself from government control of its ability to resume paying exorbitant big bonuses and salaries to its crew, the Goldman buccaneers now have to back off a little.
"Aaargh," they muttered.