This A.M.: G-20 in Pittsburgh a Gas; IPOs Up, Home Sales Down; Twitter Valued at $1 Billion

Emerging economies get new role (BBC)

G-20 roundup from Pittsburgh. Click on the above video for Russian TV footage of black-clad cops rousting black-clad protesters, as a robotic-sounding voice emanates from a police loudspeaker: "No matter what your purpose is, you must leave." NYT story here.


Twitter's Value Is Set at $1 Billion (WSJ)

Thanks to all of you who get paid nothing by Twitter despite your being its only product/asset, the company that hasn't yet generated any significant revenue is about to get $100 million in new funding. In August 2008, Twitter had 4.3 million unique visitors; this August it had 54.7 million. Now hooked, users are, like it or not, about to be bombarded by advertisers and marketers. Too bad most of you are either out of work or otherwise can't afford to buy all the shit you'll be told to buy. (See next item.)


The Long Slog: Out of Work, Out of Hope (WSJ)

Typically excellent human-interest WSJ story, this one focuses on jobless Americans. Introducing an array of hard-luck yarns: "Nearly 15 million Americans are jobless, and the number is widely expected to remain high even as the economy slowly begins to recover. Part of the problem many of the unemployed face: the very fact that they have been out of work a long time."


IPO Market Snaps Back as Taste for Risk Returns (WSJ)

Five companies go public — the biggest IPO week in a year and a half. One of them is electric-car battery maker A123 Systems. Two others are REITs.


Boss blames smartphones for stress as company suicide rate comes under scrutiny (The Age, Melbourne)

CFO at France's biggest telecom warns that, as story says, "the barrage of emails from smartphones and personal computers was stressing out employees."


Market's Eyes Are Bigger Than Its Stomach; Chokes On New Supply (StreetInsider.com)

Double bubble trouble.


Yes, Celebs Have Tax Issues Too (ABC News)

No, not a reality show, but a slideshow.

MORE HEADLINES FOLLOW

Twitter Figures Out How to Make a Bundle

All that bullshit you've tweeted on Twitter about yourself, your interests, your habits, every mundane detail of your desperate life — it's all about to finally pay off. Not for you, but for Twitter.

Biz Stone and his crew are getting ready to roll out "commercial accounts that will entice business users to pay for premium services like detailed analytics." Seems like a smart plan, and of course Twitter's been working on this for a while, and Biz Stone has of course been itching to get rolling on the moolah front. This new development from Twitter itself is not particularly good news for CoTweet, which is already helping businesses navigate through the tweet dreck.

Twitter's "pro accounts" would seem to make a lot more sense for advertisers and marketers than hoping that people will see their ads amid all the billions of posts. And it's better, in a way, for Twitter users because you won't see such plastered ads. What you will feel, however, is penetration into your own personal business by advertisers.

Wait till they get their hands on all that detailed info you've given them for free.

Maybe you don't mind behavioral targeting — you may even embrace the idea of someone taking all your social networking on Twitter and Facebook and detailed records of your Google search activity and turning it over to advertisers, the government, et al., so that various entities can check up on you, pander to you, or manipulate you.

As to the power of Twitter, here's just the latest tidbit: AdAge's "Could Twitter Destroy Hollywood's Marketing Magic?" It concerns the impact of "commenter culture" (ugh, what a phrase) on who goes to which movie.

The 'link economy': Hyundai's shrewd 'Twitter for gas' ad campaign

Best nascent advertising strategy of the year — so far: Hyundai's Twitter feed, as Matthew DeBord points out in "Will Twitter for Gas" on The Big Money:

Hyundai kicked off its summer-long Gas Lock promotion yesterday with some PR high-jinks. Via Twitter (and radio spots), the Korean carmaker revealed the location of gas stations in Queens, NY, Chicago, and Los Angeles where for a few hours, folks could purchase regular old 87-octane gas for $1.49/gallon. ...

Twitter is definitely becoming a way that carmakers reach consumers. Expect that to continue as the industry landscape is remade over the next few years.

Autoblog's take on Hyundai's Twitter feed. More on the "link economy" here, here, and here.

Tweet! Tweet! Ford pulls out all marketing stops for parodic Fiesta campaign -- AIDS, cancer, hunger, God

Ford's massive campaign to promote its European model Fiesta ahead of its introduction into the U.S. invades New York City on Friday, but the automaker's social-media blitz has already started.

You've gotta hand it to Ford. Here's how it's promoting its agitprop for Fiesta: "FORD FIESTA AGENTS TEAM WITH GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER: AGENTS WILL DELIVER MEALS TO LOCAL NYC RESIDENTS THIS FRIDAY"

The unbailed-out automaker — Detroit's Big One — has a "director of social media" now, so what do you expect but "The Fiesta Movement," an ad campaign already plastered on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Flickr.

OK, so Ford's social media ad campaign is not as entertaining as the tail-chasing tale of hypocritical adulterer Senator John Ensign on Titter.

In fact, this ad campaign — full of self-referential stuff that makes it sound like a parody of an ad campaign (is it?) — does point to a growing use of social media that's already obvious: a blitz of marketing in which you'll have a hard time distinguishing friend from foe online. Restating the obvious: Any day now, Facebook and its ilk will no longer be referred to as "social media." They'll just be called "media" as more and more advertisers invade what is for now mostly interpersonal space and turn "social" into "marketing."

Ford needs to do something. In case the company itself doesn't mention it, "Ford pins hopes on small car market," as Australia's Manufacturers' Monthly points out. That's actually "small-car market," with the hyphen, although the car market is definitely smaller. In Australia, for example, auto sales are down about 20 percent.

As a preview of Ford's hard-sell campaign over here for the Fiesta, here's the promo material for what it calls "LOCAL FORD FIESTA AGENTS GIVE BACK":

This Friday local New York City Ford Fiesta Agents will give back to the community by delivering meals for God's Love We Deliver, an organization that provides nutritious, home-delivered meals to people with life-altering illnesses such as HIV/AIDS and cancer. These New York residents are just a few of the 100 trendsetters from across the country who are driving the Fiesta as part of Ford's six-month interactive and viral ad campaign.

Agents are finding ways to integrate their Fiestas with the community. These interactive experiences allow drivers to tap into their vast social network community and share their experiences using various social media platforms.

The whole process is part of Ford's viral ad campaign, the Fiesta Movement, aimed at tech-savvy car owners who will want to include a trendy, fuel-efficient Fiesta in their daily lifestyle.

Pretty strange that Ford would use the word "viral" in a campaign that vows to help AIDS victims. But that's what "viral" means these days, as AIDS recedes from the headlines and as even less reputable hucksters than car dealers try to bareback us online to buy their products.

Twitter and Facebook face a big, big threat: Google's all-in-one Wave

Will Google's new Wave drown both Twitter and Facebook before the latter two even have a chance to monetize their huge networks of Earthlings? PC World's David Coursey uses more than 140 characters to raise the question "Is Google Wave a Twitter Killer?":

Google Wave could be the Twitter that everyone really wants. Maybe it's the Facebook, too.

Shown for the first time on Thursday at Google's I/O developer conference, Wave is described as "equal part conversation and document" for its uses as a collaboration tool. But, the leap from what Google says Wave is today to what it can easily become is a short one.

Don't pay no never mind, Coursey says, to how Google is portraying Wave so far (Google's Wave page). It's not a foregone conclusion, he adds, that Wave will drown the competition — once it's seen as competition. But he does note that the rumors that Google would buy either Twitter or Facebook haven't come to pass. And why would Google do that when it's rolling out something as comprehensive as Wave? He writes:

If Google wants to compete, head-to-head, with Twitter and Facebook, Wave is the perfect start. It may not be a competitor when it first becomes publicly available, perhaps because the merging of documents, feeds, photos, e-mail, instant messaging, event planning, and other features is likely to seem so unfamiliar to users.

It will likely take time before would-be users really understand what Wave does and can be used for. How much time? Months, not years.

Then give Wave a more public face--documents, chats, IMs, etc.--to be shared with everyone on your contact list or the world at-large and Wave does everything Facebook and Twitter do. And more.

Remember this: Google (unlike Facebook and Twitter) already knows how to make money off the Web by selling ads. And remember AOL and MySpace, both of which prove how quickly the Next Big Thing gets overtaken by the next one.

Even if Wave doesn't drown Twitter and Facebook, its all-in-oneness — its potential to spread the news, e-mail, blogging, etc. more efficiently — poses a grave threat to an already dying daily-newspaper industry.

Bubble trouble? Not Twitter. At least, not yet.

You don't need even 140 characters to sum up Twitter. How about this:

We have no revenue model or management team, but we're worth $1 billion!

As opposed to daily newspapers, which have revenue models and management teams and are worth nothing.

Poor little Twitter, the Wall Street Journal notes, "trips on its rapid growth":

Even as Twitter's users have jumped to an estimated 32.1 million from 1.6 million a year ago, the San Francisco company has just 45 employees, up from around 21 in January, and it has brought on only a handful of people with sales or business experience.

So, let's see . . . Twitter is free and it doesn't sell ads. In fact, as one analyst notes, "it has no current revenue stream." Yet, despite its built-in obnoxiousness, there are billion reasons to love Twitter — not the least of which is that it's such a beautiful little bubble boy:

Speculation continues as to the company being sold. Twitter raised $35 million from venture capitalists in February, on top of about $20 million previously raised. That month, Twitter received a $255 million valuation that makes it unlikely the company would sell for anything less than $1 billion, people familiar with the matter say.

U.K. names its first Twittercrat

His title? "Director of Digital Engagement."

As in the U.S., millions of characters in the U.K. are laying out their lives 140 characters at a time. Now the U.K. government's bureaucracy has stepped into Web 2.0 by appointing a chief of Twittering, an old-school type named Andrew Stott.

What's been free and easy until now — Twittering — may be on the way to becoming regulated and, at the expense of users, profit-making.

The £160,000-a-year post has been condemned by opposition MPs as "a grotesque amount of public money to waste on a pointless job" and the Taxpayers Alliance, which said "the Government should not be spending money on a Twittercrat during a recession." ...

In addition to investigating "jams" and "mashups", some new administrative functions have been placed on the Twittercrat's shoulders. He'll chair what's called the Knowledge Council, and implement the recommendations of the "Power of Information Taskforce" - which recommends better government through wiki-fiddling. Oh, and he'll look after the Civil Service web site.

This is not making watchdog groups in the U.K. too happy. Taxpayer Alliance researcher Matthew Sinclair questioned the role of civil servants jumping on the Web 2.0 bandwagon:

"We've seen new media used effectively by political groups and campaigns, like Barack Obama's in the States, but the Civil Service trying to get in on this fad just suggests they have no idea of their proper function. While people do need information in order to access services this isn't going to come through impermanent systems like Twitter. This is either a faddish waste of time or is actually going to be the use of taxpayers' money for political purposes."

Web 2.0 has created a golden age for bureaucrats not seen since the COBOL era.

Meanwhile, hints of trouble on Web 1.0, where Google's paid ad clicks plummeted in April, according to observers of the friendly but secretive Mountain View, California, giant of search services. In "Google money machine all cranked out?," Cade Metz of the Register (U.K.) points to a reportedly 26 percent drop in paid clicks during the four weeks ending May 9:

And with Google controlling upwards of 60 per cent of the search market, you have to wonder if Mountain View is finally feeling the Meltdown.

Nefarious characters plan invasion of Twitter

Twitter's already being terraformed: A PR agency has been set up to do major marketing and propaganda on it.

From the Register (U.K.) late last week:

Twitter Partners has been started up by angel investor Peter Read with advisers including Lastminute.com founders Martha Lane Fox and Brent Hoberman, plus others. There is no business relationship with Twitter itself, and Twitter Partners will offer, it says: "a suite of apps, tools and services to help brands, media companies, and celebrities harness the power of the Twitter ecosystem."

Yeah, an "ecosystem" — the bullshit has already started. As the Register's reliably smart-ass headline writers put it:

'A Twitter PR agency: Just what the world needs now'

Or how to stop your client doing a Britney in less than 140 characters.

Like a bucket of sweet syrup laid out for hummingbirds, Facebook has been assaulted by marketers eager to invade that planet's statusphere, as I noted last month.

No surprise that profit-takers are trying to use the networks, but in the case of Facebook, at least, users don't seem to mind this brainwashing.